Glock 43
Last tested:

On this page: Verdict · Our Verified Review · The Good · The Not Good · Product Description · What others think · FAQ
The verdict Not Good: Not Reliable. It had malfunctions, and she didn’t like the grip.
Our Verified Review
Owned and tested by our reviewer, Andrea
Andrea had her Glock 43 for a few months, and she used it for the range and carry. Ours was a Gen 4-era model, bought used.
She didn’t like that it had malfunctions, and in her words, it’s not reliable. She had repeated stovepipe malfunctions with a variety of ammo types and across a variety of uses. We had it evaluated by a gunsmith, who didn’t find anything obviously wrong. We also checked whether an improper grip might be causing the malfunctions and couldn’t clearly rule it out, but we don’t seem to have the problem with other Glocks or other pistols in general.
She also didn’t like the grip. For smaller hands it’s good, but the grip isn’t like a SIG Sauer. Her verdict: Not Good.
The Good ✅
- Good for Smaller Hands: For smaller hands, it’s good.
The Not Good ❌
The deal-breaker is tagged.
- Deal-breaker Not Reliable: Repeated stovepipe malfunctions with a variety of ammo types and across a variety of uses. A gunsmith didn’t find anything obviously wrong.
- The Grip: She didn’t like the grip; it isn’t like a SIG Sauer.
Product Description
Specs and maker’s details
The Glock 43 is Glock’s original slimline single-stack 9mm, basically a single-stack take on the Glock 19, and one of the most concealable pistols Glock makes. It holds 6 rounds, compared with 10 in the longer-gripped 43X.
Andrea used hers for the range and carry. Ours was a Gen 4-era model, bought used.
What others think
How our verdict compares with other reviews
Overall reception: Owners rate it highly. Bud’s Gun Shop shows 4.9 out of 5 from 78 reviews and Sportsman’s Warehouse shows 4.7 out of 5 from 63, and Glock’s reputation for reliability is a big part of that.
Where owners agree: It’s small, slim and easy to carry, and 6 rounds is limiting. Many add a +2 magazine extension or move to the 43X.
Where owners disagree: Grip fit and stovepipes. One Bud’s buyer says his pinky hangs off the bottom, while another with large hands calls it more comfortable than some full-size pistols. When small Glocks stovepipe, owners are usually told it’s limp-wristing or ammo (a Glock warranty rep said the same in one Reddit thread), though one r/Glocks owner says his 43 keeps doing it while his 43X never has.
Our take: Andrea’s 43 runs against the reputation: repeated stovepipes across ammo types and uses, and a gunsmith found nothing obviously wrong. We couldn’t fully rule out grip, but we don’t have the problem with other Glocks or pistols. For a carry gun, that unreliability is the deal-breaker. It suits smaller hands, but she still didn’t like the grip.
Sources (checked Oct 18, 2026): Bud’s Gun Shop ratings and reviews · Sportsman’s Warehouse ratings · r/Glocks stovepipe thread · Glock 43 product page
Frequently Asked Questions
Quick answers to common questions
Is the Glock 43 good?
Andrea says Not Good. She didn’t like that it had malfunctions, and she says it was not reliable.
Is the Glock 43 reliable?
Not for Andrea. Ours had repeated stovepipe malfunctions with a variety of ammo types and across a variety of uses. A gunsmith evaluated it and didn’t find anything obviously wrong. We couldn’t clearly rule out an improper grip, but we don’t seem to have the problem with other Glocks or other pistols in general.
Is the Glock 43 good for smaller hands?
Andrea says it’s good for smaller hands, but the grip isn’t like a SIG Sauer, and she didn’t like the grip.
What did Andrea use the Glock 43 for?
The range and carry.
How long did Andrea have it?
A few months.
A huge thank you to Andrea for taking the time to share her honest opinion and for supporting our project. Real reviews from real people are what GoodNotGood is all about, and support like yours is what takes us from good to great. We truly appreciate you!
Welcome to GoodNotGood.
Every review on this site comes from an actual person who has owned, used, and lived with the product. No spec sheets. No press kits. No ghostwritten fluff.
We don’t pretend to be perfectly objective or subject matter experts. We don’t chase stars or clicks. We just tell you honestly what we thought — the good, the not good, and everything in between.
In the age of synthetic content, the most valuable thing we can offer is simple authenticity.
One real person. One real experience. Take it or leave it.
More information on our reviews and our review philosophy
Disclaimer: GoodNotGood does not sell firearms. This review is based on our personal experience only.





Own this? Tell us if it's Good or Not Good for you
Tick “I own it” to vote. One vote per review, no sign-in, no personal data stored.
Votes come from readers who say they own it. They aren't verified and don't change our verdict.